Judgment Header
Amran Bin Eusuff & Anor v Public Prosecutor [2002] SGCA 20
Court DecisionSGCA
[2002] SGCA 20
[2002] SGCA 20
Court of Appeal of Singapore1 Apr 2002Criminal Appeal No 23 of 2001
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ut escaping the gallows, that argument is a non-starter. Self-induced notions of the existence of a promise do not render statements inadmissible: see Amran Bin Eusuff and another v Public Prosecutor [2002] SGCA 20 at [36] (in the context of self-induced threats). As for his claim that the MDP Notice was a promise by i”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Appeal No 23 of 2001
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2002-04-01
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.