Judgment Header
Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18
Court DecisionSGCA
[2004] SGCA 18
[2004] SGCA 18
Court of Appeal of Singapore19 Apr 2004CA 103/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 9 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
9Later cases and laws citing this decision
“d to vile vilification, clouding all reasonable and rational decision and producing a perverted pursuit for personal gains (see the case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 at paras 20 and 22).””
“d to vile vilification, clouding all reasonable and rational decision and producing a perverted pursuit for personal gains (see the case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 at paras 20 and 22).””
“d to vile vilification, clouding all reasonable and rational decision and producing a perverted pursuit for personal gains (see the case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 at paras 20 and 22).””
“Fortune Frontier (M) Sdn Bhd [2015] 10 CLJ 599, Dr Lim Boon Ping v Sun Pharmaceutical Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 1669, and the Singapore case of Pang Yong Hock and another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18. [14] I am mindful that questionable motivations such as the Plaintiff’s self-interest per se do not amoun”
“It will also raise the question whether the intended action is going to be in the interests of the company at all’: per Tay Yong Kwang J in Pang Yong Hock and another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18.” [39] Leave was also declined in Eow Fun Siew & Chen Siew Wei v Mutual Life Sdn Bhd [2017] 1 LNS 1259, a”
Show 4 moreShow fewer
“d to vile vilification, clouding all reasonable and rational decision and producing a perverted pursuit for personal gains (see the case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 at paras 20 and 22). [73] Whilst we share the concern of the learned JC in that the court ‘cannot but be”
“ignored. In Celcom, the Court stated at page 653: "[28] ... The test of the interest of the company can be found in the Singapore case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 [2004] 3 SLR 1, in this passage: Having established that an applicant is acting in good faith and that a cl”
“ion does not have any reasonable chance of success, … [28] … The test of the interest of the company can be found in the Singapore case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 [2004] 3 SLR 1, in this passage: Having established that an applicant is acting in good faith and that a c”
“d to vile vilification, clouding all reasonable and rational decision and producing a perverted pursuit for personal gains. See the case of Pang Yong Hock and Another v PKS Contracts Services Pte Ltd [2004] SGCA 18 at paragraphs 20 and 22. 25 of 54 [73] Whilst we share the concern of the learned JC in that the Court “c”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 103/2003
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-04-19
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.