Judgment Header
Chew Seow Leng v Public Prosecutor [2005] SGCA 11
Court DecisionSGCA
[2005] SGCA 11
[2005] SGCA 11
Court of Appeal of Singapore7 Mar 2005Cr App 16/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“in Mohamed Hussain v Public Prosecutor [1996] 2 SLR(R) 706 at [52] and [62]–[63]; Fung Choon Kay v Public Prosecutor [1997] 2 SLR(R) 547 (“Fung Choon Kay”) at [19]; Chew Seow Leng v Public Prosecutor [2005] SGCA 11 at [33].”
“raised by an accused person even when the latter does not object to the admission of his statement. Third, a similar argument was rejected by the Court of Appeal in Chew Seow Leng v Public Prosecutor [2005] SGCA 11 (“Chew Seow Leng”). In Chew Seow Leng, the appellant contended that the trial judge had erred in relying”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Cr App 16/2004
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-03-07
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.