Judgment Header
Chin Bay Ching v Merchant Ventures Pte Ltd [2005] SGCA 29
Loading…
[2005] SGCA 29
Court of Appeal of Singapore17 May 2005CA 86/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“will. They rely heavily on Credit Guarantee Corp Malaysia Bhd v SSN Medical Products Sdn Bhd [2017] 2 MLJ 629 and the Singapore Court of Appeal decision in Chin Bay Ching v Merchant Ventures Pte Ltd [2005] SGCA 29 to contend that because an apology is intrinsically a volitional act of contrition, it lies beyond the coe”
“SSN Medical Products Sdn Bhd [2017] 2 MLJ 629, Harminder Singh JCA (as he then was) at para [70] and [71], referred to the Singapore Court of Appeal case of Chin Bay Ching v Merchant Ventures Pte Ltd [2005] SGCA 29 and held that an apology by its very nature should be voluntary and cannot be compelled: “[70] In this re”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Chin Bay Ching v Merchant Ventures Pte Ltd [2005] SGCA 29
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 86/2004
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-05-17
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.