Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Lim Poh Lye and Another [2005] SGCA 31
Court DecisionSGCA
[2005] SGCA 31
[2005] SGCA 31
Court of Appeal of Singapore15 Jul 2005Cr App 2/2005
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ith the question whether the prisoner intended to inflict the injury in question.” (emphasis added) 18 [37] The principle in Virsa Singh was reiterated in Public Prosecutor v Lim Poh Lye and another [2005] SGCA 31 where the Singapore Court of Appeal explained its decision 12 years earlier in Tan Chee Hwee v PP [1993] 2”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Cr App 2/2005
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-07-15
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.