Judgment Header
CX v CY (minor: custody and access) [2005] SGCA 37
Loading…
[2005] SGCA 37
Court of Appeal of Singapore19 Jul 2005CA 104/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“While the Court cannot be exhaustive on types of issues that would fall under the category of custody, the case of CX v CY (minor: custody and access) [2005] SGCA 37 (“CX v CY”) has helpfully established that custody typically encompasses decision-making on religion, education and major healthcare issues . It is pertin”
“custody, care and control and access to a child, the court should take into account the welfare of the child as the paramount consideration. In making this assessment, the Court of Appeal in CX v CY [2005] SGCA 37 has given guidance that the court generally leans in favour of joint parenting, at [26]:”
“On the issue of joint or sole custody, I referred to the case of CX v CY [2005] SGCA 37, which is the landmark Court of Appeal decision where the principle of joint parenting was endorsed, and which stated that acrimony alone is not considered to be sufficient to justify a sole custody”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
CX v CY (minor: custody and access) [2005] SGCA 37
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 104/2004
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-07-19
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.