Judgment Header
IW v IX [2005] SGCA 48
Court DecisionSGCA
[2005] SGCA 48
[2005] SGCA 48
Court of Appeal of Singapore13 Oct 2005OM 24/2005
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“I took the term “welfare” in its widest sense, for it is not “possible or desirable to define it” – [IW v IX [2005] SGCA 48 at (26)].”
“The term “welfare” is to be taken in its widest sense and what would be in the best interests of the child must necessarily depend on all the circumstances of the case: IW v IX [2005] SGCA 48 at [26]-[27].”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: OM 24/2005
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-10-13
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.