Judgment Header
The Polo/Lauren Co, LP v Shop-In Department Store Pte Ltd [2006] SGCA 14
Court DecisionSGCA
[2006] SGCA 14
[2006] SGCA 14
Court of Appeal of Singapore6 Apr 2006CA 67/2005
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“etter view is that ‘extraneous factors’ should be included in determining if there is a likelihood of confusion on the facts. This was the view of this court in Polo (CA). The observation was made ([2006] SGCA 14 at [25]) that if Parliament had intended that upon establishing similarity in marks and goods there would i”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 67/2005
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-04-06
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.