Judgment Header
Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28
Court DecisionSGCA
[2007] SGCA 28
[2007] SGCA 28
Court of Appeal of Singapore9 May 2007CA 100/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 12 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
12Later cases and laws citing this decision
“Master Mulia Sdn Bhd [2018] 3 MLJ 608 **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 87 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28; [2007] 3 SLR 86 Taman Bandar Baru Masai Sdn Bhd v Dindings Corporations Sdn Bhd [2009] MLJU 793; [2010] 5 C”
“Master Mulia Sdn Bhd [2018] 3 MLJ 608 **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 87 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28; [2007] 3 SLR 86 Taman Bandar Baru Masai Sdn Bhd v Dindings Corporations Sdn Bhd [2009] MLJU 793; [2010] 5 C”
“dn Bhd v Master Mulia Sdn Bhd [2018] 3 MLJ 608 SJIC Bina Sdn Bhd v Iskandar Regional Development Authority and another case [2020] MLJU 2366 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmont Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 Stadco Sdn Bhd v. Woolley Development Sdn Bhd [2013] 1 LNS 483 **Note : Serial number will be used to verif”
“39. I was also referred by counsel for Cobrain to the Singapore case of Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 [2007] 3 SLR 86, which I find is of guidance here where in that case, as was in the Tribunal before herein, and which I adopt as part of my reasoning herein, the Arbitrator ha”
“39. I was also referred by counsel for Cobrain to the Singapore case of Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 [2007] 3 SLR 86, which I find is of guidance here where in that case, as was in the Tribunal before herein, and which I adopt as part of my reasoning herein, the Arbitrator ha”
Show 7 moreShow fewer
“Ors [1998] 2 MLJ 20 SDA Architects v. Metro Millenium Sdn Bhd [2014] 3 CLJ 632 Sigur Ros Sdn Bhd v. Master Mulia Sdn Bhd [2018] 8 CLJ 291 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 S/N 204gfNlprEG2b2DJcHsAmw **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via”
“Bay Sdn Bhd and another case [2017] MLJU 145 SJIC Bina Sdn Bhd v Iskandar Regional Development Authority and another case [2020] MLJU 2366 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 Som Datt Builders Ltd v. State of Kerala [2009] INSC 1600 SQA Builders Sdn Bhd v Luxor Holdings Sdn Bhd & An”
“Bay Sdn Bhd and another case [2017] MLJU 145 SJIC Bina Sdn Bhd v Iskandar Regional Development Authority and another case [2020] MLJU 2366 Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 Som Datt Builders Ltd v. State of Kerala [2009] INSC 1600 SQA Builders Sdn Bhd v Luxor Holdings Sdn Bhd & An”
“th the applicable law and if I may be permitted to borrow the words of the Singapore Court of Appeal on a similar point, where it was held in Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 [2007] 3 SLR 86 that: “[44] There is now an established line of cases that vividly illustrates the princi”
“th the applicable law and if I may be permitted to borrow the words of the Singapore Court of Appeal on a similar point, where it was held in Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 [2007] 3 SLR 86 that: “[44] There is now an established line of cases that vividly illustrates the princi”
“th the applicable law and if I may be permitted to borrow the words of the Singapore Court of Appeal on a similar point, where it was held in Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28 [2007] 3 SLR 86 that: “[44] There is now an established line of cases that vividly illustrates the princi”
“re the argument by which it reaches its decision is one which does not reasonably flow from any of the already argued or submitted premises — see Soh Beng Tee & Co Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28; [2007] 3 SLR (R) 86, discussed in The Government of India v Cairns Energy & Anor [2014] 9 MLJ 149. **Not”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 100/2006
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-05-09
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.