Judgment Header
Ng Chye Huey and Another v Public Prosecutor [2007] SGCA 3
Court DecisionSGCA
[2007] SGCA 3
[2007] SGCA 3
Court of Appeal of Singapore24 Jan 2007Cr M 24/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“010). The Singaporean equivalent to our s. 35 CJA was also grouped under the heading “revision”. Notwithstanding the common heading, the Singapore Court of Appeal in NG CHYE HUEY V. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2007] SGCA 3 (at 42-53) likewise held that the High Court’s supervisory and revisionary jurisdictions are separate and”
“such arguments would encourage future resort to unorthodox and objectionable manoeuvres in the hope of circumventing onerous procedural requirements. (see Ng Chye Huey And Another V Public Prosecutor [2007] SGCA 3) [106] In Gouriet’s case which was referred to by the Supreme Court in Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Si”
“The Singaporean equivalent to our section 35 CJA was also grouped under the heading “Revision”. Notwithstanding the common heading, the Singapore Court of Appeal in Ng Chye Huey v Public Prosecutor [2007] SGCA 3 (at 42-53) likewise held that the High Court’s supervisory and revisionary jurisdictions are separate and sh”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Cr M 24/2006
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-01-24
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.