Judgment Header
Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew [2007] SGCA 31
Court DecisionSGCA
[2007] SGCA 31
[2007] SGCA 31
Court of Appeal of Singapore25 Jun 2007CA 106/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“AOM also endorsed, at [24] and [26], the test for setting aside a judgment or order pursuant to Order 32 Rule 5 of the Rules of Court, as set out in its earlier decision in Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew [2007] SGCA 31, [2007] 3 SLR(R) 673. In Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew, the Court of Appeal held as follows at [44] and [45]:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 106/2006
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-06-25
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.