Judgment Header
Britestone Pte Ltd v Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd [2007] SGCA 47
Court DecisionSGCA
[2007] SGCA 47
[2007] SGCA 47
Court of Appeal of Singapore28 Sept 2007CA 144/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“he contemporaneous documents, there is no other evidence for the Court to verify its truth or otherwise of such oral testimony. [See the case of Britestone Pte Ltd v Smith and Associates Far East Ltd [2007] SGCA 47]”
“ourse of the trial, never shifting regardless of the evidence that is led.” The Singapore Court of Appeal in an earlier case of Britestone Pte Ltd v Smith & Associates Far East Ltd [2007] 4 SLR 855; [2007] SGCA 47 (“Britestone”) explained the difference between “legal burden of proof” and “evidential burden of proof” a”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 144/2006
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-09-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.