[2007] SGCA 6 — Court of Appeal of Singapore judgment

Court DecisionSGCA

[2007] SGCA 6

Court of Appeal of Singapore13 Feb 2007CA 48/2006

Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Subsequent treatment

Cited in 5 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.

How this case connects

Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.

Cited by

Later cases and laws citing this decision

CitedMAJU HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. (Company No.: 40444-V) v SPRING ENERGY SDN. BHD. (Company No.: 446344-H) (WA-24NCC-134-03/2020)Case
“15. Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v. Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 6.”
CitedSeacera Group Berhad v Ismail bin Othman (WA-24NCC-622-04/2022)Case
“tinguish the debt, the Court should grant the injunction to allow the cross claim to be proved instead of allowing the winding-up petition to be filed (Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 6 at [82]). [28] I agree with learned counsel for the Plaintiff that the Intended Petition in respect of the”
CitedV Medical Services M Sdn Bhd v Swissray Asia Healthcare Co. Ltd (WA-24NCC-205-03/2022)Case
“Chee Lin J in Awangsa (supra). [32] Next, I should consider whether to grant the Fortuna injunction, based on the test in Tan Kok Tong (supra) and Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 6, CA in that the court must be satisfied that the debt is bona fide disputed on substantial S/N l/QxvltED0GcCrKe”
CitedS & S QUEST RESOURCES SDN BHD v JEWEL BUILDERS & RESOURCES (M) SDN BHD (WA-24NCC-146-03/2023)Case
“Bhd (formerly known as United Merchant Finance Bhd) [2006] 2 MLJ 602 11. Josu Engineering Construction Sdn Bhd v TSR Bina Sdn Bhd [2014] 11 MLJ 916 12. Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 6 LEGISLATION REFERENCE:”
CitedPT RAJAWALI CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL v FIC PROPERTIES SDN. BHD. (WA-24NCC(ARB)-4-02/2023)Case
“ut in jeopardy by the premature presentation of a winding up petition against it where it has a serious cross-claim based on substantial grounds [See: Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v. Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 6; Pontian United Theatre Sdn Bhd v. Southern Finance Berhad [2006] 1 CLJ 1067; Josu Engineering Constructio”

Authorities cited

Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on

No outgoing citations detected.

Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.

Judgment Header

Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 6

Case Metadata

Case No: CA 48/2006

Case Metadata

Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore

Case Metadata

Decision Date: 2007-02-13

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal