[2008] SGCA 18

“gs while waiting for a prior Order to allow for the Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 PODs. [190] In the Singapore Court of Appeal decision of The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd [2008] SGCA 18, the Court of Appeal held that the Court had jurisdiction to extend the time for a creditor to file its pr”

“ourts in England, Singapore and India in the 2023 High Court judgment in Top Builders Capital and by the Singapore Court of Appeal in The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd [2008] SGCA 18 [“The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd”]. [48] In Kempe v Ambassador Insurance Co [1998] 1 WLR 271 [“Kempe”], th”

“all follow the reasoning in Caratti in preference to the reasoning in Kempe. [emphasis added] [31] The Singapore Court of Appeal in The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd [2008] SGCA 18, after considering the differences between the aforesaid English and the Australian approaches, had opted f”

“) for the 1st Intervener Mohamad Haziq bin Mohamad Asman (Messrs. Akram Hizri Azad & Azmir) for the 2nd Intervener Case reference 1. The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd [2008] SGCA 18 2. SAAG Oilfield Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) v Shaik Ab”