Judgment Header
The "Vasiliy Golovnin" [2008] SGCA 39
Court DecisionSGCA
[2008] SGCA 39
[2008] SGCA 39
Court of Appeal of Singapore19 Sept 2008CA 109/2007, 110/2007, Adm in Rem 25/2006, RA 214/2006, 216/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“based on all relevant information. [25] This principle is supported by cases such as Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors [2017] 11 MLJ 233, and The "Vasiliy Golovnin" [2008] SGCA 39, where the Singapore Court of Appeal clarified that ‘full and frank disclosure’ requires the revelation o”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 109/2007, 110/2007, Adm in Rem 25/2006, RA 214/2006, 216/2006
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-09-19
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.