Judgment Header
The "Vasiliy Golovnin" [2008] SGCA 39
Loading…
[2008] SGCA 39
Court of Appeal of Singapore19 Sept 2008CA 109/2007, 110/2007, Adm in Rem 25/2006, RA 214/2006, 216/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“based on all relevant information. [25] This principle is supported by cases such as Pentamaster Instrumentation Sdn Bhd v QAV Technologies Sdn Bhd & Ors [2017] 11 MLJ 233, and The "Vasiliy Golovnin" [2008] SGCA 39, where the Singapore Court of Appeal clarified that ‘full and frank disclosure’ requires the revelation o”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
The "Vasiliy Golovnin" [2008] SGCA 39
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 109/2007, 110/2007, Adm in Rem 25/2006, RA 214/2006, 216/2006
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-09-19
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.