Judgment Header
Tjong Very Sumito and Others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] SGCA 41
Loading…
[2009] SGCA 41
Court of Appeal of Singapore26 Aug 2009CA 171/2008, Suit 348/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 9 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ere is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred. (Emphasis added.) (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] 4 SLR 732; [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that ‘if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement”
“ere is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred. (Emphasis added.) (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] 4 SLR 732; [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that ‘if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement”
“hd v Ekovest Bhd & Anor [2021] MLJU 156 41 Tindak Murni Sdn Bhd v Juang Setia Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2020] 3 MLJ 545; [2020] 4 CLJ 301 Tjong Very Sumito And Others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] SGCA 41 TNB Fuel Services Sdn Bhd v China National Coal Group Corp [2013] 4 MLJ 857 Usahasama SPNB-LTAT Sdn Bhd v. A”
“(b) that there is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred. (emphasis added). (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v. Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that "if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement, then”
“ere is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred. (Emphasis added.) (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] 4 SLR 732; [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that ‘if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement”
“ere is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred. (Emphasis added.) (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] 4 SLR 732; [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that ‘if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement”
“ere is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred. (Emphasis added.) (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] 4 SLR 732; [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that ‘if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement”
“(b) that there is in fact no dispute between the parties with regard to the matters to be referred.” (emphasis ours). (See for example Tjong Very Sumito and others v. Antig Investments Ptd Ltd [2009] SGCA 41 which stated that “if it was at least arguable that the matter is the subject of the arbitration agreement, then”
“referred to and finally resolved by arbitration”. The words “arising out of or in connection with” are broad and expansive: see, for example, Tjong Very Sumito and Others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] SGCA 41 (“Tjong Very Sumito”), where the Court of Appeal considered that a clause referring to disputes “arising o”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Tjong Very Sumito and Others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] SGCA 41
Case Metadata
Case No: CA 171/2008, Suit 348/2008
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-08-26
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.