Judgment Header
Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] SGCA 22
Loading…
[2010] SGCA 22
Court of Appeal of Singapore27 May 2010Civil Appeal No 115 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“37. In the Republic of Singapore, the Court of Appeal in Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] SGCA 22; [2010] 3 SLR 587 adopted a stance consistent with the principles articulated in Yang Salbiah. Although the judgment also made reference to the English decision of Moeliker v A Reyrolle and Co Ltd [1”
“37. In the Republic of Singapore, the Court of Appeal in Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] SGCA 22; [2010] 3 SLR 587 adopted a stance consistent with the principles articulated in Yang Salbiah. Although the judgment also made reference to the English decision of Moeliker v A Reyrolle and Co Ltd [1”
“uidelines”) at p 3). 15 is “the maximum score” (see Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77 at [59]) and 3 is “the lowest possible” score (see Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] SGCA 22 (“Samuel Chai”) at [44]), with a score of 3 – 8 being considered “severe” (see the Guidelines at p 3). Ag”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] SGCA 22
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 115 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-05-27
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.