Judgment Header
Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan and others v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 33
Court DecisionSGCA
[2010] SGCA 33
[2010] SGCA 33
Court of Appeal of Singapore3 Sept 2010Criminal Appeal No 1 of 2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“flict injury to the deceased. In this respect, we were invited to adopt the approach taken by the Singapore Court of Appeal (the apex 10 court of Singapore) in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan & Ors v. PP [2010] SGCA 33 and Muhammad bin Kadar and Another v. PP [2011] SGCA 32 with regard to the issue of common intention unde”
“the deceased. In this respect, we were invited to adopt the approach taken by the Singapore Court of Appeal (the apex court of Singapore) in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan and others v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 33 and 1955 Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32 with regard to the issue of co”
“the deceased. In this respect, we were invited to adopt the approach taken by the Singapore Court of Appeal (the apex court of Singapore) in Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan and others v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGCA 33 and 1955 Muhammad bin Kadar and another v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 32 with regard to the issue of co”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Appeal No 1 of 2008
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-09-03
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.