Judgment Header
George Raymond Zage III and another v Ho Chi Kwong and another [2010] SGCA 4
Court DecisionSGCA
[2010] SGCA 4
[2010] SGCA 4
Court of Appeal of Singapore10 Feb 2010Civil Appeal No 3 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“the Court of Appeal (“CA”) in Bansal Hermant Govindprasad and another v Central Bank of India [2003] 2 SLR(R) 33 (“Bansal”). However, in George Raymond Zage III and another v Ho Chi Kwong and another [2010] SGCA 4 (“George Raymond Zage III”) the test for dishonesty was revisited as the court in Bansal had not considere”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 3 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-02-10
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.