Judgment Header
Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) [2011] SGCA 21
Court DecisionSGCA
[2011] SGCA 21
[2011] SGCA 21
Court of Appeal of Singapore11 May 2011Civil Appeal No 122 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 4 other later decisions. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by 1. ) SAMALAJU INDUSTRIES SDN BHD v MALAYSIAN PHOSPHATE VENTURE SDN BHD (WA-24NCC(ARB)-17-05/2024)
- Distinguished by 1. ) Dato' Ler Cheng Chye (Pelikuidasi-pelikuidasi Bagi Pustaka Efektif Sdn. Bhd. (Dalam Likuidasi)) v 1. ) ATURAN PRISMA SDN BHD (WA-22NCC-378-06/2024)
- Distinguished by KHONG YOON LOONG v ASIA PLANTATION CAPITAL PTE LTD (WA-22NCC-627-11/2022)
- Distinguished by PENINSULA EDUCATION (SETIA ALAM) SDN. BHD. v BIAXIS (M) SDN. BHD. (IN LIQUIDATION) (B-02(IM)(C)-1834-11/2023)
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
8Later cases and laws citing this decision
- Distinguished1. ) SAMALAJU INDUSTRIES SDN BHD v MALAYSIAN PHOSPHATE VENTURE SDN BHD (WA-24NCC(ARB)-17-05/2024)Case
“on clause as was held in Arch Reinsurance Ltd v. Akcay Holdings Sdn Bhd [2019] 1 CLJ 305; [2018] MLJU 2117. [67] The Singapore Court of Appeal's decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v. Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
- Distinguished1. ) Dato' Ler Cheng Chye (Pelikuidasi-pelikuidasi Bagi Pustaka Efektif Sdn. Bhd. (Dalam Likuidasi)) v 1. ) ATURAN PRISMA SDN BHD (WA-22NCC-378-06/2024)Case
“nsidered in the COA case of Peninsula v Biaxis and was distinguished. The relevant excerpts are as follow – “[67] The Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
“on clause as was held in Arch Reinsurance Ltd v. Akcay Holdings Sdn Bhd [2019] 1 CLJ 305; [2018] MLJU 2117. [67] The Singapore Court of Appeal's decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v. Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
- DistinguishedPENINSULA EDUCATION (SETIA ALAM) SDN. BHD. v BIAXIS (M) SDN. BHD. (IN LIQUIDATION) (B-02(IM)(C)-1834-11/2023)Case
“g **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 34 of 43 [67] The Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
“and others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] 4 SLR(R), 732 and Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) [2011] SGCA 21. These illustrate that stay applications that come within the purview of an arbitration agreement are allow”
Show 3 moreShow fewer
“nd Gas Pte Ltd S/N AQn0hitsdE2U9Uk9aqoJIw **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 15 v Petropod Ltd (in liq) (Cayman Islands and Singapore)) [2011] SGCA 21, [2011] 3 SLR 414 ('Larsen') V K Rajah JA, delivering the judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal, at pa”
- CitedHASHIM BIN ABD RAZAK v PEMBINAAN PD JAYA SDN. BHD. (Dalam Likuidasi) (N-02(IM)(NCvC)-1761-10/2024)Case
“erify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 39 [70] The Singaporean authority of Larsen Oil And Gas Pte Ltd v. Petropod Ltd (In Liquidation) And IN Compulsory Liquidation In Singapore [2011] SGCA 21) provides an analytical framework for reconciling the often-competing domains of arbitration and insolvency”
“Joint Stock Company) [2020] SGCA 33 (AnAn) (Singapore Court of Appeal). [96] Earlier in 2011 in Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petropod Ltd (in liquidation) and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore [2011] SGCA 21 (‘Larsen’) the Singapore Court of Appeal considered whether Petropod’s, claims against Larsen fell within t”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 122 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-05-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.