Judgment Header
Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) [2011] SGCA 21
Loading…
[2011] SGCA 21
Court of Appeal of Singapore11 May 2011Civil Appeal No 122 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 4 other later decisions. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“on clause as was held in Arch Reinsurance Ltd v. Akcay Holdings Sdn Bhd [2019] 1 CLJ 305; [2018] MLJU 2117. [67] The Singapore Court of Appeal's decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v. Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
“nsidered in the COA case of Peninsula v Biaxis and was distinguished. The relevant excerpts are as follow – “[67] The Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
“on clause as was held in Arch Reinsurance Ltd v. Akcay Holdings Sdn Bhd [2019] 1 CLJ 305; [2018] MLJU 2117. [67] The Singapore Court of Appeal's decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v. Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
“g **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 34 of 43 [67] The Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Larsen Oil & Gas Pte Ltd v Petrograd Ltd [2011] SGCA 21 can be distinguished from the present case as there the liquidator sought the avoidance of payment it had”
“and others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] 4 SLR(R), 732 and Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) [2011] SGCA 21. These illustrate that stay applications that come within the purview of an arbitration agreement are allow”
“nd Gas Pte Ltd S/N AQn0hitsdE2U9Uk9aqoJIw **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 15 v Petropod Ltd (in liq) (Cayman Islands and Singapore)) [2011] SGCA 21, [2011] 3 SLR 414 ('Larsen') V K Rajah JA, delivering the judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal, at pa”
“erify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 39 [70] The Singaporean authority of Larsen Oil And Gas Pte Ltd v. Petropod Ltd (In Liquidation) And IN Compulsory Liquidation In Singapore [2011] SGCA 21) provides an analytical framework for reconciling the often-competing domains of arbitration and insolvency”
“Joint Stock Company) [2020] SGCA 33 (AnAn) (Singapore Court of Appeal). [96] Earlier in 2011 in Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petropod Ltd (in liquidation) and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore [2011] SGCA 21 (‘Larsen’) the Singapore Court of Appeal considered whether Petropod’s, claims against Larsen fell within t”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v Petroprod Ltd (in official liquidation in the Cayman Islands and in compulsory liquidation in Singapore) [2011] SGCA 21
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 122 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-05-11
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.