Judgment Header
Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng [2011] SGCA 64
Court DecisionSGCA
[2011] SGCA 64
[2011] SGCA 64
Court of Appeal of Singapore28 Nov 2011Civil Appeal No 231 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ing that the appellant is bound by the Deed and so it remains for the respondent to discharge its burden of proving that the appellant had in fact signed the Deed. In Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng [2011] SGCA 64, the appellant sought specific performance of a sale and purchase agreement that the respondent claimed h”
“findings of fact are plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence; or (b) the trial judge overlooked material facts and/or took into account irrelevant facts (Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Leng [2011] SGCA 64 at [18]). After considering all the evidence, including the objective evidence in the form of various mess”
“In Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng [2011] SGCA 64, the appellant had exercised the option validly by delivering the option with the duly executed acceptance copy and the sum of 5% of the purchase price (less the option fee) to the vendor’s (responde”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 231 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-11-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.