Judgment Header
Thong Ah Fat v Public Prosecutor [2011] SGCA 65
Court DecisionSGCA
[2011] SGCA 65
[2011] SGCA 65
Court of Appeal of Singapore30 Nov 2011Criminal Appeal No 13 of 2010 (Criminal Case No 17 of 2010)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
4Later cases and laws citing this decision
“also JAFFAR B. ABU & ANOR V. PP [1933] 2 MLJ 363). [36] I must also need to refer to the observation of Justice V.K. Rajah in the Singapore Court of Appeal case of THONG AH FATT V. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2011] SGCA 65 on the judicial duty to give reasons. It states: “About two centuries ago, Lord Mansfield reportedly gave”
“also JAFFAR B. ABU & ANOR V. PP [1933] 2 MLJ 363). [36] I must also need to refer to the observation of Justice V.K. Rajah in the Singapore Court of Appeal case of THONG AH FATT V. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2011] SGCA 65 on the judicial duty to give reasons. It states: “About two centuries ago, Lord Mansfield reportedly gave”
“also JAFFAR B. ABU & ANOR V. PP [1933] 2 MLJ 363). [36] I must also need to refer to the observation of Justice V.K. Rajah in the Singapore Court of Appeal case of THONG AH FATT V. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2011] SGCA 65 on the judicial duty to give reasons. It states: “About two centuries ago, Lord Mansfield reportedly gave”
“d the learned presidents to give such reasons.” [7] It is apropos and apposite to refer to the observation of VK Rajah JA in the Singapore Court of Appeal case of THONG AH FAT v PUBLIC 20 PROSECUTOR [2011] SGCA 65 on the judicial duty to give reasons. It states: “About two centuries ago, Lord Mansfield reportedly gave”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Appeal No 13 of 2010 (Criminal Case No 17 of 2010)
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-11-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.