Judgment Header
Ching Mun Fong v Standard Chartered Bank [2012] SGCA 38
Court DecisionSGCA
[2012] SGCA 38
[2012] SGCA 38
Court of Appeal of Singapore26 Jul 2012Civil Appeal No 120 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“succeed in an application for discovery, the applicant must Satisfy the Court that the documents requested are both “relevant” and “necessary”. In the case of CHIN MUN FONG V STANDARD CHARTERED BANK [2012] SGCA 38, the Court of Appeal highlighted that an application for pre-action discovery would only be “necessary” wh”
“2020] MLJU 910, a case involving a pre-action discovery application under Order 24 Rule 7A ROC where it was held as follows: Page 23 of 32 [15] ln the case of CHIN MUN FONG V STANDARD CHARTERED BANK [2012] SGCA 38, the Court of Appeal highlighted that an application for pre-action discovery would only be “necessary” wh”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 120 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-07-26
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.