Judgment Header
Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart [2012] SGCA 39
Court DecisionSGCA
[2012] SGCA 39
[2012] SGCA 39
Court of Appeal of Singapore31 Jul 2012Civil Appeal No 145 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 1 other later decision. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by CFG (MSIA) SDN BHD v NG TANG YANG (BA-A52-11-02/2022)
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“care during the term of the Agreement, as evidenced by SSM records showing business activity, breached Clause 2.5.1. Plaintiff distinguished the Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart [2012] SGCA 39 case relied upon by Defendant, emphasizing that in this case, an express clause (Clause 2.5.1) prohibited”
“74. Whilst there is a distinction between the duties of good faith and fiduciary duties by reference to the position held by employee, (See: Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart [2012] SGCA 39), I note that the Defendant has not pleaded separate facts to support each type of breach. There are as many”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 145 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-07-31
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.