Judgment Header
Wang Wenfeng v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 47
Court DecisionSGCA
[2012] SGCA 47
[2012] SGCA 47
Court of Appeal of Singapore23 Aug 2012Criminal Appeal No 17 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 12 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
12Later cases and laws citing this decision
“a dinyatakan: **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“a dinyatakan: **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“t" di bawah s. 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkiple Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“t" di bawah s. 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkiple Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“t" di bawah s. 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkiple Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
Show 7 moreShow fewer
“t" di bawah s. 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkiple Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“t" di bawah s. 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkiple Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“t" di bawah s. 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkiple Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“ably deduced, that the injury was accidental or otherwise unintentional.” (emphasis added) [34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death,”
“bawah section 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkepli Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: “[34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“bawah section 300(c) yang dinyatakan di atas telah juga disentuh dalam kes Zulkepli Mohamad di mana dinyatakan: “[34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
“the decision of the Federal Court in Zulkiple Mohamad’s case (supra) where the issue was explained as follows: “[34] In another Singapore Court of Appeal decision, it was held in Wang Wenfeng v. PP [2012] SGCA 47 that if the bodily injury intentionally inflicted was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Appeal No 17 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-08-23
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.