Judgment Header
Lee Wee Lick Terence (alias Li Weili Terence) v Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) and another appeal [2012] SGCA 63
[2012] SGCA 63
Court of Appeal of Singapore2 Nov 2012Civil Appeals Nos 44 and 46 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“tion in the context of their Act on statutory adjudication. In Lee Wee Lick Terence (alias Li Weili Terence) v Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) and another appeal [2012] SGCA 63; [2013] 1 SLR 401 the Court of Appeal had to reconcile the seemingly conflicting approaches to the issue”
“ence) v Chua Say Eng (formerly **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 16 trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) and another appeal [2012] SGCA 63 at paragraph [30] explained this with precision: the power of the ANB (Authorised Nominating Body) to nomin”
“urt of Appeal when faced with a not too dissimilar argument in Lee Wee Lick Terence (alias Li Weili Terence) v Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) and another appeal [2012] SGCA 63 observed as follows: “90 Accordingly, there is nothing in the language of reg 5(1) of the SOPR to compel”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Lee Wee Lick Terence (alias Li Weili Terence) v Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) and another appeal [2012] SGCA 63
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeals Nos 44 and 46 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-11-02
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.