Judgment Header
AYM v AYL [2012] SGCA 68
Loading…
[2012] SGCA 68
Court of Appeal of Singapore23 Nov 2012Civil Appeal No 21 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In AYM v AYL [2012] SGCA 68; [2013] 1 SLR 924 (“AYM”), the Court of Appeal made the following observations:”
“In AYM v AYL [2012] SGCA 68; [2013] 1 SLR 924, the Court of Appeal made the following observations at [11], [12], [15], [22], [23], [25] and [27] to [30]:”
“The ambit of section 112(4) of the Women’s Charter 1961 was explained in detail by the Court of Appeal in AYM v AYL [2012] SGCA 68; [2013] 1 SLR 924 (“AYM v AYL”), and is summarised in the following passage from WRP v WRQ [2023] SGHCF 12 at [4]:”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
AYM v AYL [2012] SGCA 68
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 21 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-11-23
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.