Judgment Header
GAK v GAL [2013] SGCA 19
Court DecisionSGCA
[2013] SGCA 19
[2013] SGCA 19
Court of Appeal of Singapore22 Feb 2013Civil Appeal No 27 of 2012 and Summons No 5380 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“First, we disagree that this is a situation where the requirement of non-availability may be dispensed with. In GAK v GAL [2013] SGCA 19, we acknowledged that there are certain exceptional circumstances where the court would be entitled, in its discretion, to admit further evidence on appeal even though the Ladd v Mars”
“the Ladd v Marshall test should not be applied rigidly as if it were a statutory provision (Cheng-Wong Mei Ling Theresa v Oei Hong Leong [2006] 2 SLR(R) 637 (“Cheng-Wong Theresa”) at [39]; GAK v GAL [2013] SGCA 19 (“GAK v GAL”) at [32]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 27 of 2012 and Summons No 5380 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-02-22
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.