[2014] SGCA 20

“roceedings in a divorce. This issue was addressed by the Court of Appeal and the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) (“High Court”) in the cases of Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee [2014] SGCA 20 (”Thery”) (at [50]) and TBZ v TCA [2017] SGHCF 17 (at [69]) respectively, and these cases are binding on”

“ile maintenance may be ordered in respect of a child over the age of 21 who is serving full-time National Service, in view of the approach of the Court of Appeal in Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee [2014] SGCA 20 (at [48]-[50]), other recourse is necessary and the son should consider making an application under s 69”

“1 when Riveria was purchased, her Citibank account had some $750,000. The second term loan was maintained, as well, when her Citibank accounts had over $500,000. In Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee [2014] SGCA 20 (“Thery”), the Court of Appeal gave guidance at [31]–[32] that such loans may be taken as paid up. I agre”

“I make no maintenance order for C1 in the instant proceedings as he is 21 years old. The Court of Appeal’s guidance in Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee [2014] SGCA 20 (“Thery Patrice Roger”) at [50] is that a child who has attained 21 years of age must personally make an application for maintenance under s 69(3)(b) o”

“The parties agreed that there be maintenance ordered for C1 even though she is above 21. However, in Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Thee [2014] SGCA 20 (“Thery”), the Court of Appeal held that the son, who was above 21 years old, should have personally made an application for maintenance under s 69(3)(b) of the Women’s”