Judgment Header
Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 4
Court DecisionSGCA
[2014] SGCA 4
[2014] SGCA 4
Court of Appeal of Singapore14 Jan 2014Civil Appeal No 167 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“y at that stage of the cause or matter’ lends weight to this approach. [40] This legal position in respect of pre-action discovery was reiterated in Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 4; [2014] 2 SLR 208, where Justice VK Rajah held: “The utility and benefits of this procedure, however, must b”
“40. This legal position in respect of pre-action discovery was reiterated in Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 4 [2014] 2 SLR 208, where Justice VK Rajah held, The utility and benefits of this procedure, however, must be calibrated against the fact that pre-action disclosure of any sort is qu”
“20. This legal position in respect of pre-action discovery was reiterated in Dorsey James Michael v. World Sport Group Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 4 [2014] 2 SLR 208, where Justice VK Rajah held— “The utility and benefits of this procedure, however, must be calibrated against the fact that pre-action disclosure of any sort is”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 167 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-01-14
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.