Judgment Header
Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47
Loading…
[2014] SGCA 47
Court of Appeal of Singapore9 Sept 2014Civil Appeal No 156 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 7 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“lacuna in the remedies available to an aggrieved minority shareholder. [65] The court in Tob Chee Hoong’s case also referred to a Singapore Court of Appeal case Ng Kek Wee v. Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47 where it was held that in the context of groups of companies, courts take a practical rather than narrow a”
“ppressive or unfairly prejudicial acts or to exercise self-help negates “unfair prejudice” as control rests with the claimant. [138] The Singapore Court of Appeal in Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology [2014] SGCA 47 at [48] – [50] has this to say: ’48. In our judgment, the touchstone is not whether the claimant is a mino”
“l ER 735 which held that the conduct of a subsidiary’s affairs can also be the conduct of the parent company’s affairs. [118] The Singapore Court of Appeal case Ng Kek Wee v. Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47 held that in the context of groups of companies, courts take a practical rather than narrow and legalistic”
“(i) Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47: “[42] We think that the approach adopted in the above cited cases is sound and we also agree that, in the final analysis, the question that must be answered in this regard is whether the affairs of”
“(i) Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47: “[42] We think that the approach adopted in the above cited cases is sound and we also agree that, in the final analysis, the question that must be answered in this regard is whether the affairs of”
“emedy under section 346 of the CA should not be available to majority shareholders in control for practical reasons as well, both parties have referred to the case of Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology [2014] SGCA 47 (“Ng Kek Wee”), cited in The Bank of Nova Scotia Bhd & Anor v Lion Dri Sdn Bhd & Ors [2021] 9 MLJ 473. [2”
“ote : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 44 wrongdoer at the expense of other shareholders or creditors. In Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47, the Singapore Court of Appeal observed as follows: “Where a wrong has been done to the company, the inter”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology Ltd [2014] SGCA 47
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 156 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-09-09
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.