Judgment Header
BNS v BNT [2015] SGCA 23
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 23
[2015] SGCA 23
Court of Appeal of Singapore20 Apr 2015Civil Appeal No 141 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ecessarily overlaid by the “golden thread” of the welfare of a child as being paramount and overriding any other consideration. As was unequivocally stated by the Court of Appeal at [19] of BNS v BNT [2015] SGCA 23 (“BNS v BNT”), where proceedings directly affect the interests of children, the “first and paramount cons”
“unt consideration is to be the welfare of the child…” [emphasis added], as well as the long line of case authorities that affirms this principle (including the Court of Appeal’s judgment in BNS v BNT [2015] SGCA 23 (at [19]). It would also be applicable if this court was varying parties’ agreement relating to the care”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 141 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-04-20
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.