Judgment Header
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 30
[2015] SGCA 30
Court of Appeal of Singapore27 May 2015Civil Appeals Nos 148 and 149 of 2013; Summonses Nos 5277 and 5985 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 5 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
5Later cases and laws citing this decision
“[2017] 11 MLJ 169; PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30; and Citibank NA v Robert [2011] 3 SLR 465, where the courts had accorded 11 weight to the existence of assets within the jurisdiction when considering the issue of the appropriate forum. 35. The P”
“[2017] 11 MLJ 169; PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30; and Citibank NA v Robert [2011] 3 SLR 465, where the courts had accorded ; 11 weight to the existence of assets within the jurisdiction when considering the issue of the appropriate forum. 35. The”
“[2017] 11 MLJ 169; PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30; and Citibank NA v Robert [2011] 3 SLR 465, where the courts had accorded 11 weight to the existence of assets within the jurisdiction when considering the issue of the appropriate forum. 35. The P”
“[2017] 11 MLJ 169; PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30; and Citibank NA v Robert [2011] 3 SLR 465, where the courts had accorded 11 weight to the existence of assets within the jurisdiction when considering the issue of the appropriate forum. 35. The P”
“[2017] 11 MLJ 169; PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30; and Citibank NA v Robert [2011] 3 SLR 465, where the courts had accorded 11 weight to the existence of assets within the jurisdiction when considering the issue of the appropriate forum. 35. The P”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeals Nos 148 and 149 of 2013; Summonses Nos 5277 and 5985 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-05-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.