Judgment Header
AHQ v Attorney-General and another appeal [2015] SGCA 32
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 32
[2015] SGCA 32
Court of Appeal of Singapore22 Jun 2015Civil Appeals Nos 109 and 110 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ve had to train and supervise the domestic helper in performing household chores. Ms Cheong submits that both Husband and Wife would have had to manage the helper on a daily basis and cites ANJ v ANK [2015] SGCA 32 (“ANJ v ANK”) at [27(c)]) for the proposition that the assistance of a domestic helper would reduce the i”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeals Nos 109 and 110 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-06-22
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.