Judgment Header
ANJ v ANK [2015] SGCA 34
Loading…
[2015] SGCA 34
Court of Appeal of Singapore7 Jul 2015Civil Appeals No 102 and 103 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“respondent had also given up maintenance, and the Bankrupt had been earning a high income. All of these considerations would be relevant in matrimonial proceedings, as seen in cases such as ANJ v ANK [2015] SGCA 34.”
“he parties’ marriage should be treated as a dual-income marriage, as both parties held fulltime jobs for most of the marriage, and that the structured approach set out in ANJ v ANK [2015] 4 SLR 1043; [2015] SGCA 34 (“ANJ v ANK”) would apply to the division of matrimonial assets. Under the structured approach, the Court”
“nvestment banker prior to 2014 and contributed to the household income in the earlier half of the marriage. Accordingly, the structured approach for a dual income marriage as established in ANJ v ANK [2015] SGCA 34 should apply.”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
ANJ v ANK [2015] SGCA 34
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeals No 102 and 103 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-07-07
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.