Judgment Header
Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 42
[2015] SGCA 42
Court of Appeal of Singapore20 Aug 2015Civil Appeal No 39 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
6Later cases and laws citing this decision
“to only release it after being informed that the GST payment has been so made. [41] In the recent Singapore’s Court of Appeal’s decision in Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42, the lodgement of the adjudication response which was late by a mere 2 minutes was held to be invalid unde”
- Cited1. ) MRCB BUILDERS SDN BHD v 1. ) SMM RESOURCES SDN BHD (WA-24C-97-05/2020 & WA-24C-147-06/2020)Case
“ed Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Bhd [2013] 1 CLJ 24 Buxton Building Contractors Ltd v Governors of Durand Primary School [2004] EWHC 733 (TCC) Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42 Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd v. IRDK Ventures Sdn Bhd & Another Case [2016] 5 CLJ 882 Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd v IRDK V”
“riggs and Forrester (Plumbing Sevices) [2007] EWHC 4 as well as the Singapore cases of W Y Steel Pte Ltd v Osko Pte Ltd [2013] 3 SLR 380 and Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42. [25] SMM however retorted that the Adjudicator was entitled to withhold the Decision until payment of th”
“and the refusal to exercise the power under s 25(p) CIPAA by the Adjudicator do not amount to a breach of the rules of natural justice (see Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42, Permintex JSK Resources Sdn Bhd v Follitile (M) Sdn Bhd and another case S/N TT/Dfe17Uk26aIHq8h/gxw **Not”
“and the refusal to exercise the power under s 25(p) CIPAA by the Adjudicator do not amount to a breach of the rules of natural justice (see Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42, Permintex JSK Resources Sdn Bhd v Follitile (M) Sdn Bhd and another case S/N omRpWCvSUEiMkRvcJowdbg **Not”
Show 1 moreShow fewer
“ase of Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd v. IRDK Ventures Sdn Bhd & anor case, Lee Swee Seng J cited with approval the Singapore Court of Appeal case of Citiwall Safety Glass Pte Ltd v. Mansource Interior Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 42 which rigorously applied the principle of compliance with timelines. I am mindful that section 25(p) give”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 39 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-08-20
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.