Judgment Header
Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar and another v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2015] SGCA 45
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 45
[2015] SGCA 45
Court of Appeal of Singapore21 Aug 2015Civil Appeals Nos 80 and 81 of 2015, and Summonses Nos 235 and 256 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 11 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
11Later cases and laws citing this decision
“, or of a nature that can justify an inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar And Another v. Accent Delight International Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegat”
“, or of a nature that can justify an inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar And Another v. Accent Delight International Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegat”
“(ix) Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar & another v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SSLR 558;”
“ere was no evidence of concealment or any attempt to dissipate assets to defeat a judgment. [57] In Yves Charles Edgar Bouvier And Anor v Accent Delight International Ltd And Anor And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that the mere presence of unproven allegations of dishonesty at an int”
“, or of a nature that can justify an inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar And Another v. Accent Delight International Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegat”
Show 6 moreShow fewer
“, or of a nature that can justify an inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar And Another v. Accent Delight International Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegat”
“of this document via eFILING portal inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar And Another v. Accent Delight International Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegati”
“, or of a nature that can justify an inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar And Another v. Accent Delight International Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegat”
“nother v. Accent Delight International S/N 7P5f71Y0xkmoSQra2NSwtw **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal Ltd And Another And Another Appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegati”
“n, or of a nature that can justify an inference of, a real risk of dissipation of assets (see Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar and another v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2015] SGCA 45; [2015] 5 SLR 558). Mere allegations of these nature, even with some evidence in support of these allegat”
“n John Shipping Ltd [2025] SGCA 36 at [2]. There must also be “solid evidence” to demonstrate this risk and not bare assertions of fact: Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar v Accent Delight International Ltd [2015] SGCA 45 (“Bouvier”) at [36].”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeals Nos 80 and 81 of 2015, and Summonses Nos 235 and 256 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-08-21
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.