Judgment Header
Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 53
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 53
[2015] SGCA 53
Court of Appeal of Singapore5 Oct 2015Civil Appeal No 131 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“. In Kottakki Srinivas Patnaik v Attorney-General [2024] 1 SLR 239 (“Kottakki”), the Court of Appeal reiterated the observations the court had made in Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 53, that the applicant may raise a reasonable suspicion of the existence of grounds of judicial review by sh”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 131 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-10-05
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.