Judgment Header
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 61
Loading…
[2015] SGCA 61
Court of Appeal of Singapore30 Nov 2015Civil Appeal No 31 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
This decision has been not followed in a later judgment. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“etain the present test rather than to depart from, and adopt the Mauritian position in Dhooharika. 29 [66] The Attorney-General also referred to the Singapore case of Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 61 where the Singapore Court of Appeal declined to follow Dhooharika. The exposition by Andrew Phang JA is met”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 61
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 31 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-30
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.