Judgment Header
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 61
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 61
[2015] SGCA 61
Court of Appeal of Singapore30 Nov 2015Civil Appeal No 31 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been not followed in a later judgment. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Not followed by LEE AH HOON v LEE HOCK TEONG (WA-22NCvC-127-03/2022)
- Not followed by PCP CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD v LEAP MODULATION SDN BHD (08(i)-394-07/2018(W))
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ent test rather than to depart from, and adopt the Mauritian position in Dhooharika. [66] The attorney general also referred to the Singapore case of Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General [2016] 1 SLR 992; [2015] SGCA 61 where the Singapore Court of Appeal declined to follow Dhooharika. The exposition by Andrew Phang JA is me”
“etain the present test rather than to depart from, and adopt the Mauritian position in Dhooharika. 29 [66] The Attorney-General also referred to the Singapore case of Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 61 where the Singapore Court of Appeal declined to follow Dhooharika. The exposition by Andrew Phang JA is met”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 31 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.