Judgment Header
Prabagaran a/l Srivijayan v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 64
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 64
[2015] SGCA 64
Court of Appeal of Singapore30 Nov 2015Criminal Appeal No 12 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s to whether he had rebutted the presumptions of knowledge and possession under ss 18(2) and 21 of the MDA respectively, was dismissed on 2 October 2015: Prabagaran a/l Srivijayan v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 64.”
“cannot be expected to traverse the globe to investigate merely because an accused person mentions the names of different persons in different countries (Prabagaran a/l Srivijayan v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 64 at [59]). The PP is not required to disclose his reasons every time an applicant challenges his decision n”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Appeal No 12 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.