Judgment Header
SCT Technologies Pte Ltd v Western Copper Co Ltd [2015] SGCA 71
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 71
[2015] SGCA 71
Court of Appeal of Singapore5 Jan 2016Civil Appeal No 74 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“sive burden lies on that defendant to persuade the court to exercise its discretion to grant a stay (Spiliada at 476D); but he who asserts must prove (SCT Technologies Pte Ltd v Western Copper Co Ltd [2015] SGCA 71 (“SCT Technologies”) at [17]) and where a party seeks to establish the existence of certain matters to pe”
“their defence. Since he who asserts must prove, it is clearly Jonathan and Derek’s burden to show that Allan exists (see the decision of this court in SCT Technologies Pte Ltd v Western Copper Co Ltd [2015] SGCA 71 at [17]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 74 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2016-01-05
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.