Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat [2000] SGHC 129
Loading…
[2000] SGHC 129
General Division of the High Court of Singapore6 Jul 2000CC 42/2000
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ng the level of trust reposed in a person, the court looks to substance and not to form; thus, a person with a humble title may occupy a high position of trust (see Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat [2000] SGHC 129 at [26]). Likewise, I accept that a criminal scheme may be said to be “sophisticated” and “carefully orc”
“In determining the appropriate sentence for the accused, I note that the court in Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat [2000] SGHC 129 (“Teo Cheng Kiat”) stated at [26] that in cases “where there are multiple charges, it is of no real practical significance what the individual sentences ought to be” (“the global approach”
“In arriving at the appropriate aggregate sentence, I consider the precedents of Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat [2000] SGHC 129 (“Teo Cheng Kiat”) and Public Prosecutor v Ewe Pang Kooi [2020] 3 SLR 851 (“Ewe Pang Kooi”) to be instructive. In Teo Cheng Kiat, a global sentence of 24 years’ imprisonment was imposed. Th”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat [2000] SGHC 129
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 42/2000
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2000-07-06
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.