Judgment Header
Re Lim Wee Beng Eddie [2001] SGHC 103
Court DecisionSGHC
[2001] SGHC 103
[2001] SGHC 103
General Division of the High Court of Singapore23 May 2001OS No 110 of 2000
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In Re Lim Wee Beng Eddie [2001] SGHC 103 at [56], reproducing Muir Hunter on Personal Insolvency (1987) at pp 3018 – 3019, the court shed some light as to what constitutes “appropriateness”:”
“In assessing the propriety of such an order, the court will generally assess whether the debtor’s proposal for a voluntary arrangement is “serious and viable”. In Re Lim Wee Beng Eddie [2001] SGHC 103 (at [56]), Tay Yong Kwang JC (as he then was), quoting John Briggs & Christopher Brougham, Muir Hunter on Personal Inso”
“rts would consider whether the debtor’s proposal is “serious and viable” when determining if it is “appropriate” to make the interim order for the purposes of s 279(2) IRDA: see Re Lim Wee Beng Eddie [2001] SGHC 103 which followed Hook v Jewson.”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: OS No 110 of 2000
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2001-05-23
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.