General Division of the High… [2003] SGHC 226

Court DecisionSGHC

[2003] SGHC 226

General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Sept 2003MA 73/2003

Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.

Open official source PDF Report an issue

Subsequent treatment

Cited in 57 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.

How this case connects

Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.

Cited by

Later cases and laws citing this decision

CitedPublic Prosecutor v JEEFREY BIN APIK, AMIR BIN AFANDI (BKI-45A-5/7-2018)Case
“[82] In Dickson Levy Maria George v Public Prosecutor [2018] 1 LNS 135, the Court of Appeal referred to the decision of Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 where Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) held that: “…where the accused can show that the complainant has a motive to falsely implicate him, then the burden”
CitedNUR AISHAH BINTI ABDULLAH (JA-45A-52-06/2019)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
Cited1. ) LIM YEE SENG (BL-45A-32-12/2022)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
Cited[Pendakwa Raya] v Shah Nasir Hussain (BA-45A-29-06/2020)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374).’”
CitedMOHD FIRDAUS BIN MOHD ZAHID (TA-45A-37-12/2021)Case
“hkan mahkamah membangkitkan inferen yang bertentangan terhadap Tertuduh. 41. Tertuduh tidak mengemukakan sebarang keterangan bahawa pihak polis mempunyai motif untuk menganiyainya, Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374 bahkan semasa diperiksa balas Tertuduh mengakui pihak polis tidak ada sebab untuk membu”

Show 45 more

Cited[TIMBALAN PENDAKWA RAYA] v MOHD NAZIRUL AMRI BIN MAT JAMEL (TA-45A-20-07/2021)Case
“arikan diri sejauh 50 meter dan meronta-ronta sebelum berjaya ditangkap. Tertuduh juga tidak mengemukakan sebarang keterangan bahawa pihak polis mempunyai motif untuk menganiyainya, Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374. 36. Mahkamah memutuskan pembelaan Tertuduh hanya bersifat penafian semata-mata dan ti”
CitedMOHD SHAHRUL BIN YUSOH (BL-45A-33-10/2021)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
CitedAZYANA BINTI MAT SHAFIE (BA-45A-42-03/2021)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 33 29.1In GOH HAN HENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong”
CitedAZYANA BINTI MAT SHAFIE v SYAHEERA ROSLI (BA-45A-41-03/2021)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 33 29.1In GOH HAN HENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong”
CitedAZYANA BINTI MAT SHAFIE (BA-45A-20-02/2021)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 33 29.1In GOH HAN HENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong”
CitedAZYANA BINTI MAT SHAFIE (BA-45-8-02/2024)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 33 29.1In GOH HAN HENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong”
CitedAZYANA BINTI MAT SHAFIE (BA-45-7-02/2024)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 7 33 29.1In GOH HAN HENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yo”
CitedAZYANA BINTI MAT SHAFIE (BA-45-6-02/2024)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 33 29.1In GOH HAN HENG V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong”
Cited[Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] v MUHAMMAD HANIFF RAZRI BIN HASRI (BA-45A-141-11/2021)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374),.” 34.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong P”
Cited1. ) SHARIRUDDIN BIN SHAARI (BA-45A-116-07/2022)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 33.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
CitedMOHAMAD AMEERULLAH BIN SUPIAN (BA-45A-6-02/2023)Case
“e officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJU Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 34.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; {2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
CitedMOHAMAD AMEERULLAH BIN SUPIAN (BA-45-2-02/2023)Case
“e officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJU Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 34.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; {2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
CitedMOHAMAD AMEERULLAH BIN SUPIAN (BA-45-2-02/2023)Case
“e officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJU Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 34.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; {2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
Cited[Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)] v 1. ) CHIA KEH CHOON (BA-45A-1-01/2021)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 34.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
Cited1. ) MOHD ZULKARNAIN BIN ABDUL HAMID (BA-45A-118-08/2022)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 32.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
Cited1. ) MOHD ZULKARNAIN BIN ABDUL HAMID (BA-45A-118-08/2022)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 32.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374, Yong Pu”
CitedIZHAM NORHAZIMIE BIN MUHAMAD (BA-45A-131-10/2021)Case
“e officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 ; [2003] 4 SLR 374).” 26 t S/N euqm78R8LUeSdQidt1 9y0Q 34.In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGH”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45A-28-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45A-28-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45A-28-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45-12-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45A-28-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45-12-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
Cited1. ) MOHAMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN HASSAN (AA-45-12-09/2022)Case
“cers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as 50 they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLUJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374)." (107]. Saya mendapati keterangan SP7 bahawa beliau menahan kesemua OKT di bilik pert”
CitedMOHAMAD ZAKIR HUSIM BIN MOHD ALWI (NB-62D-222-10/2023)Case
“ice officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374).”
CitedPENDAKWA RAYA v TAMIM AZMI BIN ABDUL HAMID (PA-45A-3-01/2018)Case
“[1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226;”
CitedPendakwa Raya v Edric Ng Tze Khin (S-05(H)-58-02/2024)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
CitedEdric Ng Tze Khin v Pendakwa Raya (S-05(H)-115-03/2024)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
CitedMohd Sahari Bin Suboh v Pendakwa Raya (M-05(SH)-481-10/2024)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
Cited[Timbalan Pendakwa Raya (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] v MUHAMMAD NUR FIKRI BIN JUAHARI (CB-83D-1003-09/2020)Case
“his case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 1 MLRH 671; [1998] 4 MLJ 210 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. PP (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had this to say - "”
Cited[Pendakwa Raya] v Nor Hafiz Bin Hanapi (CJ-82-1-02/2020)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFI”
CitedAZIRIN BIN SUHOT (JG-82-2-03/2021)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra ), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had t”
CitedSuhaimi Bin Suib (WA-82D-41-09/2019)Case
“is case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 1 MLRH 671; [1998] 4 MLJ 210 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. PP (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had this to say - “I”
CitedPENDAKWA RAYA v MOHD ZAMRI BIN SAIDIN (WA-45A-34-06/2018)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). 82 [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had”
CitedPendakwa Raya v Muhammad Shafwan bin Aided (No. K/P: 920909-10-6037) (PA-45A-31-04/2018 & PA-45A-32-04/2018)Case
“ce officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226; [2003] 4 SLR 374). 72 [48] In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) ha”
CitedMOHD ASHRAF BIN MOHD SHAREH (KA-45A-19-04/2021)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
Cited1. ) SYAHRIDAN AZHAM BIN AZMI (BA-45A-74-04/2022)Case
“ss will be accepted by the court, see the cases of Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ali [1962] 1 MLJ 257, Dickson Levy a/l Maria George v Public Prosecutor [2018] MLJU 98, Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226. But this is not to say that in all cases the evidence of police witnesses should be accepted carte blan”
CitedDA-45A-4-02/2017Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
Cited[Pendakwa Raya] v NOOR HESHAM BIN HAMID (DA-45A-4-04/2019)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had th”
CitedAMIR BIN AYOB (PA-45A-34-06/2019)Case
“officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374).” [77] Oleh itu, Mahkamah ini berpendapat bahawa tiada sebab untuk SP4 mereka-reka ceri”
CitedKHEE THUAN GIAP v PENDAKWA RAYA (A-05(M)-445-09/2017)Case
“e officers in this case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). [48] In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had thi”
Cited`ARIFF ARHANAN BIN CHE UDIN v PENDAKWA RAYA (N-05(M)-195-04/2019 dan N.05(SH)-209-04/2019)Case
“ficers in this 10 case to frame up the appellant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty. (See the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v. PP [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v. PP [2003] SGHC 226 [2003] 4 SLR 374). 15 [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor (supra), Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) ha”
CitedMatin Bin Sahid v Pendakwa Raya (S-05(M)-44-01/2022)Case
“ant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty (see the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v Public Prosecutor [1998) 4 MLJ 210; [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226; [2003]. [48] In Goh Han Heng v. Public Prosecutor, Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had this to say: I disa”
CitedLINGESWARAN A/L AMBALAKHAN v Pendakwa Raya (K-05(SH)-372-08/2024)Case
“ant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty (see the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v Public Prosecutor [1998) 4 MLJ 210; [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226; [2003]. [48] In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor, Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had this to say: I disag”
CitedMohd Nazri Bin Wahab v Pendakwa Raya (J-05(SH)-567-11/2023)Case
“ant with the impugned drugs, as they were just performing their duty (see the cases of Mohd Ali Jaafar v Public Prosecutor [1998) 4 MLJ 210; [1998] 4 CLJ Supp 208 and Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226; [2003]. [48] In Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor, Yong Pung How CJ (Singapore) had this to say: I disag”

Showing 50 of 57

Authorities cited

Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on

No outgoing citations detected.

Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.

Judgment Header

Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 226

Case Metadata

Case No: MA 73/2003

Case Metadata

Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore

Case Metadata

Decision Date: 2003-09-30

Something wrong on this page?

Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.

Report an issue Request removal