Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and Another [2004] SGHC 120
Loading…
[2004] SGHC 120
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Jun 2004CC 17/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In a similar vein, in Public Prosecutor v Raffi bin Jelan and Another [2004] SGHC 120, the High Court observed (at [24]):”
“It is perhaps useful at this juncture to consider the scenario where the court deems that the maximum of 20 years’ PD should be imposed (see, eg, Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and another [2004] SGHC 120; Public Prosecutor v Syed Hamid bin A Kadir Alhamid [2002] 2 SLR(R) 1018; Heng Jong Cheng v Public Prosecutor”
“D. This is to ensure that a dangerous offender ought not to be “afforded even the slightest opportunity to give sway to his criminal tendencies again” (Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and another [2004] SGHC 120 (“Raffi”) at [25]).”
“n to be a menace to society: see Perumal s/o Suppiah at [38]; Kua Hoon Chua v Public Prosecutor [1995] 2 SLR(R) 1 at [7]. In similar vein, the court in Public Prosecutor v Raffi bin Jelan and another [2004] SGHC 120 at [24]–[25] had this to say about the PD regime:”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and Another [2004] SGHC 120
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 17/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-06-07
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.