Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and Another [2004] SGHC 120
Court DecisionSGHC
[2004] SGHC 120
[2004] SGHC 120
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Jun 2004CC 17/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
4Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In a similar vein, in Public Prosecutor v Raffi bin Jelan and Another [2004] SGHC 120, the High Court observed (at [24]):”
“It is perhaps useful at this juncture to consider the scenario where the court deems that the maximum of 20 years’ PD should be imposed (see, eg, Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and another [2004] SGHC 120; Public Prosecutor v Syed Hamid bin A Kadir Alhamid [2002] 2 SLR(R) 1018; Heng Jong Cheng v Public Prosecutor”
“D. This is to ensure that a dangerous offender ought not to be “afforded even the slightest opportunity to give sway to his criminal tendencies again” (Public Prosecutor v Raffi Bin Jelan and another [2004] SGHC 120 (“Raffi”) at [25]).”
“n to be a menace to society: see Perumal s/o Suppiah at [38]; Kua Hoon Chua v Public Prosecutor [1995] 2 SLR(R) 1 at [7]. In similar vein, the court in Public Prosecutor v Raffi bin Jelan and another [2004] SGHC 120 at [24]–[25] had this to say about the PD regime:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 17/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-06-07
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.