Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Tan Ping Koon and Another [2004] SGHC 205
Court DecisionSGHC
[2004] SGHC 205
[2004] SGHC 205
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 Sept 2004CC 27/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“apping Act is entirely artificial. The Prosecution submits that the phrase “for ransom” within s 3 admits of only one meaning. The High Court decision in Public Prosecutor v Tan Ping Koon and another [2004] SGHC 205 (“Tan Ping Koon”) makes it clear that the mens rea of the s 3 offence is satisfied once the abductor abd”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 27/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2004-09-09
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.