Judgment Header
Kunal Gobind Lalchandani and Another v Konduri Prakash Murthy [2005] SGHC 94
Court DecisionSGHC
[2005] SGHC 94
[2005] SGHC 94
General Division of the High Court of Singapore13 May 2005Suit 915/2003
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“law is clear, however, that a mistake by a solicitor is insufficient reason to justify granting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal (see Kunal Gobind Lalchandani v Konduri Prakash Murthy [2005] SGHC 94 at [35] citing Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd [2002] 3 SLR 357 at [13]–[14]). More import”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 915/2003
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2005-05-13
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.