Judgment Header
Summit Co (S) Pte Ltd v Pacific Biosciences Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 190
Loading…
[2006] SGHC 190
General Division of the High Court of Singapore19 Oct 2006CWU 34/2005
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ined at [31] that “the notion of unfairness lies at the heart of the ‘just and equitable’ jurisdiction in s 254(1)(i)”. As Belinda Ang Saw Ean J in Summit Co (S) Pte Ltd v Pacific Biosciences Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 190 (“Summit”) observed at [5], the objective test for unfairness is “whether a reasonable bystander observi”
“a reasonable bystander observing the consequences of the impugned conduct would regard it as having unfairly prejudiced the applicant’s interests: Summit Co (S) Pte Ltd v Pacific Biosciences Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 190 at [5]; RCMA Asia Pte Ltd v Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd [2020] SGHC 205 at [59]. Of especial relevance to”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Summit Co (S) Pte Ltd v Pacific Biosciences Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 190
Case Metadata
Case No: CWU 34/2005
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-10-19
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.