Judgment Header
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit [2006] SGHC 220
Loading…
[2006] SGHC 220
General Division of the High Court of Singapore1 Dec 2006Suit 261/2006, 262/2006, SUM 2838/2006, 2839/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“v London Express Newspaper, Limited [1944] AC 116; Goldsmith and another v Bhoyrul and others [1998] QB 459; Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and others and another suit [2007] 1 SLR 675; [2006] SGHC 220 (‘Lee Hsien Loong v SOP’)). [Emphasis added] **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the origin”
“ect his reputation (see Knupffer v. London Express Newspaper Limited [1944] AC 116; Goldsmith and Another v. Bhoyrul and Others [1998] QB 459; Lee Hsien Loong v. Singapore Democratic Party and Others [2006] SGHC 220 ("Lee Hsien Loong v. SOP ")). [37] The defendants, however, denied that the words in question either ref”
“rotect his reputation (see Knupffer v London Express Newspaper Limited [1944] AC 116; Goldsmith and another v Bhoyrul and Others [1998] QB 459; Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and others [2006] SGHC 220 ("Lee Hsien Loong v SDP"))). [35] The last case cited in the foregoing paragraph, Lee Hsien Loong v SDP,”
“(7) Lee Hsien Loong v. Singapore Democratic Party & Ors and Another Suit [2006] SGHC 220.”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit [2006] SGHC 220
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 261/2006, 262/2006, SUM 2838/2006, 2839/2006
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-12-01
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.