Judgment Header
MZ v NA [2006] SGHC 95
Court DecisionSGHC
[2006] SGHC 95
[2006] SGHC 95
General Division of the High Court of Singapore6 Jun 2006D 3220/2004, RAS 14/2006, 18/2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“er might think that $50 is more reasonable”. The court clarified that vis-à-vis such discretionary decisions, the privilege and duty of making that call lies with the judge at first instance (MZ v NA [2006] SGHC 95 at [5], as cited in Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah [2007] SGCA 21 (“Koh Bee Choo”) at [46]).”
“ple of law, or had clearly made an error of fact that was not only obvious, but also significant, thereby leading to consequences that are unfair to the parties (Koh Bee Choo at [46], quoting MZ v NA [2006] SGHC 95 at [5]). In the present case, it appears that the DJ had, in determining parties’ indirect contributions,”
“has failed to appreciate certain material facts”. The appellate court will also be slow to make minor adjustments for idiosyncratic reasons (see Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai Huah at [46], citing MZ v NA [2006] SGHC 95 at [5]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: D 3220/2004, RAS 14/2006, 18/2006
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2006-06-06
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.